Join 250,000+
professionals today
Add Insights to your inbox - get the latest
professional news for free.
Join our 250K+ subscribers
Join our 250K+ subscribers
Subscribe07 FEB 2025 / PCAOB UPDATES
There’s an old saying: “Trust, but verify.” In the world of audits, this couldn’t be more true, especially for specialists. Auditors rely on valuation experts, actuaries, and engineers for the tough calculations. But here’s where things can go sideways. The PCAOB has made it clear in a recently published Spotlight report that just because an expert says something doesn’t make it gospel. If auditors don’t put specialists’ work under the microscope, they could be signing off on financial statements that are as solid as a Jenga tower.
Back in the day, audits were pretty straightforward. You checked the books, verified transactions, and made sure everything added up. But as businesses grew and financial reporting became more complex, auditors started bringing in specialists to crunch the tough numbers. That’s all well and good until auditors take their word as the final answer without asking the hard questions.
The PCAOB isn’t having it. They recently reminded audit firms that over-relying on specialists without proper oversight is like letting someone else drive your car blindfolded. It’s a disaster waiting to happen. If a specialist’s work isn’t properly assessed, auditors might miss glaring errors, leading to massive financial misstatements and, in some cases, SEC investigations.
Not all specialists are created equal, and how they’re engaged makes a huge difference. Some companies have in-house specialists, while others bring in outside experts to handle valuations. Auditors may also have their in-house experts or hire independent specialists when things don’t add up.
Here’s where things get tricky. Suppose a company claims its real estate portfolio is worth $500 million based on a specialist’s report. An auditor who just nods and moves on without verifying the valuation is playing with fire. The PCAOB expects auditors to dig deeper, Are the assumptions reasonable? Were alternative valuation methods considered? Does the specialist have any financial incentives that could have swayed their opinion?
The PCAOB warns that poor evaluation of specialists can lead to major audit deficiencies. Some of the biggest risks include:
The PCAOB expects auditors to assess four key factors:
With the PCAOB increasing scrutiny, audit firms must be proactive in reviewing specialist work. Here’s how:
Specialists play an important role in audits, but they don’t get a free pass. Auditors can’t just take their word for it. The PCAOB expects firms to be skeptical, ask tough questions, and verify everything before signing off on financial statements. Audit firms that get this right will stay out of trouble, keep clients happy, and avoid regulatory nightmares. Those that don’t? Well, let’s just say the PCAOB has a front-row seat, and they’re keeping score. Subscribe to MYCPE ONE Insights for the latest in finance, accounting, and corporate news delivered straight to your inbox.
Until next time…
Don’t forget to share this story on LinkedIn, X and Facebook
📢MYCPE ONE Insights has a newsletter on LinkedIn as well! If you want the sharpest analysis of all accounting and finance news without the jargon, Insights is the place to be! Click Here to Join